NewsArchive
01-31-2011, 01:49 AM
Hi Friedrich,
Couple of weeks ago I was building a final release for a client which
includes code signing about 15 dlls and executables. I do that in a single
SB script that I call from BA so that I can codesign without doing a full
build. To my surprise the build failed on the code signing.
After some investigation I found that the comodoca.com which I had used on
all the code signing statements was unavailable for whatever reason. So I
had to change all the code signing statements to use the verisign.com
timestamp server.
Would it be possible to have an alternative? I.e. be able to pick the
comodoco.com one as primary and the verisign.com one as secondary, so that
if one fails SB will automatically try the other one?
Best regards,
--
Arnór Baldvinsson - Icetips Alta LLC
Port Angeles, Washington
www.icetips.com - www.buildautomator.com - www.altawebworks.com
Icetips product subscriptions at http://www.icetips.com/subscribe.php
Couple of weeks ago I was building a final release for a client which
includes code signing about 15 dlls and executables. I do that in a single
SB script that I call from BA so that I can codesign without doing a full
build. To my surprise the build failed on the code signing.
After some investigation I found that the comodoca.com which I had used on
all the code signing statements was unavailable for whatever reason. So I
had to change all the code signing statements to use the verisign.com
timestamp server.
Would it be possible to have an alternative? I.e. be able to pick the
comodoco.com one as primary and the verisign.com one as secondary, so that
if one fails SB will automatically try the other one?
Best regards,
--
Arnór Baldvinsson - Icetips Alta LLC
Port Angeles, Washington
www.icetips.com - www.buildautomator.com - www.altawebworks.com
Icetips product subscriptions at http://www.icetips.com/subscribe.php